Lane v. Brown landmark Settlement Agreement announced

Disability Rights Oregon

cpr

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Settlement Agreement Announced in Lane v. Brown Employment Case

Contact Information:

Bob Joondeph
Disability Rights Oregon
(503) 243-2081

Steven Schwartz
Cathy Costanzo
Center for Public Representation
(413) 586-6024

Portland, Ore.
December 30, 2015

The U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon approved a settlement agreement between the Justice Department, a class of private plaintiffs and the state of Oregon, which resolved the department’s and the class plaintiffs’ claims against the state under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).  The agreement will impact approximately 7,000 Oregonians with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) who can and want to work in typical employment settings in the community.  The private plaintiffs were represented by the Center for Public Representation, Disability Rights Oregon and the law firms of Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP and Perkins Coie LLP.  The agreement resolves a class action lawsuit by private plaintiffs in which the department intervened.  The parties’ settlement agreement was approved by U.S. Magistrate Judge Janice Stewart of the District of Oregon, who presided over the lawsuit.

The agreement calls for 1,115 people in sheltered workshops to receive jobs in the community at competitive wages over the next seven years.  In addition, 7,000 people will receive employment services that will afford them the opportunity to work in the community, including at least 4,900 youth ages 14 to 24 years old, who are exiting school.  At least half of the youth served will receive an Individual Plan of Employment, which sets forth the services and supports necessary to achieve competitive employment, from Oregon’s vocational rehabilitation system.

The Settlement Agreement, negotiated by state officials, the U. S. Department of Justice and attorneys for individuals with developmental disabilities, stems from a class action lawsuit, Lane v. Brown, that charged Oregon with violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Olmstead v. L.C. by segregating individuals with disabilities in settings where they have little to no interaction with non-disabled peers.

Lead plaintiff Paula Lane, who made a high of 66 cents an hour packaging gloves on a sheltered workshop assembly line over a 12-month period in 2010-11, recently started a community-based job that pays minimum wage.  She said her new job is “good,” and said, “I can make more money this way.”

Executive Orders 15-01 and 13-04, the Oregon Department of Human Services’ (DHS) Integrated Employment Plan (Revised July 2015), the DHS Employment First Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement Plan, the DHS Employment First Communication, Outreach, and Awareness Plan, the Oregon Office of Developmental Disability Services’ Training and Capacity Plan, and the Oregon Office of Vocational Rehabilitation Services’ (OVRS) Provider Transformation Grant Program together represent a commitment by the State of Oregon to reform its employment service system for individuals with I/DD. The Settlement Agreement builds upon these plans and commitments, and incorporates many of their provisions.

We at DRO as well as our co-counsel, The Center for Public Representation, Miller Nash and Perkins Coie are very pleased for Oregonians with intellectual and developmental disabilities who want to pursue greater independence and self-sufficiency through gainful employment.  We look forward to working collaboratively with the State of Oregon to implement the provisions of the settlement.


Read the rest of our coverage of our involvement in Lane v. Brown here.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,